Trump's actions have demonstrated that he is perfectly happy to tear up conventions and treaty obligations on a whim.
Why should Starmer make a slew of harsh concessions, including potentially on digital services taxation, food safety, free speech etc. to get a "deal" that could be binned any time?
Why should Starmer make a slew of harsh concessions, including potentially on digital services taxation, food safety, free speech etc. to get a "deal" that could be binned any time?
Comments
However, our govt (let’s not personal this to Starmer) could reverse any ‘tax concessions’ given to the US immediately …
His ridiculous ‘signature’ on executive orders is rarely legal because Congress has the last word.
He'll flip out and whack us with more tariffs - that's the sort of person he is.
Bizarrely Starmer seems to think he has a "special relationship" with Trump! Weird!