Can someone please explain it would be “commend[able]” for any clinical research organization to twice publish a book that pathologizes (yes, pathologizes) homosexuality **ONLY** for them to later issue an “apolog[y]” (and some passage retractions) once they were confronted about the matter?
Comments
Is it “commend[able]” that Grof’s passages about LSD-assisted scatolia remain published?
Despite this, MAPS has not publicly addressed this patently abusive approach.
https://youtu.be/SKa6D51RBfs?si=cXqW4sjvaCgs4xvI