I agree that SVS would be an acceptable solution, but the UTC has repeatedly stated that it is not willing to define SVS for epigraphic or calligraphic glyph variants (they already rejected my proposal for ogham variation sequences in L2/16-110)
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
I'll have to check out your proposal. Still, given their position on glyph variants (which applies to discrete characters too), I wonder what the justification was for including "insular" letters in the Latin Extended D block: Ꝺ, ꝺ, Ꝼ, ꝼ, Ᵹ, Ꞃ, ꞃ, Ꞅ, ꞅ, Ꞇ, ꞇ.
Comments