gently suggest that everyone who wrote or edited this at the @nytimes.com be gently guided into a career that's not journalism because this is uhhh, real bad - ThreadSky

dceiver.bsky.social • 4 days ago

gently suggest that everyone who wrote or edited this at the @nytimes.com be gently guided into a career that's not journalism because this is uhhh, real bad

Reposted from Ben K.

The Times has moved on from sane-washing lies to just straight up creating them.

Comments

teresaberkowitz.bsky.social•4 days ago

What so mean? Those writers and editors are just honing their propaganda skills for their future in state sanctioned communications.

rogerailes.bsky.social•4 days ago

Mogg's NYT profile says she's "particularly interested in answering health questions and debunking scams to help readers live a healthier life

So she's particularly stupid.

andylevy.net•4 days ago

they’re on a roll https://bsky.app/profile/andylevy.net/post/3ljsmza5qbs2x

thorbenson.bsky.social•4 days ago

senorstinkfist.bsky.social•4 days ago

A recent college graduate! Bang up start to the career.

ogg921.bsky.social•4 days ago

And they printed that drivel w/o an editor, or someone who lives in reality, making her fix the absolute BS? Oy.

superblue811.bsky.social•4 days ago

Katie Maga?

bsorohan.bsky.social•4 days ago

No disrespect to real stenographers, but calling themselves journalists and then just engaging in retyping whatever some administration flack just said does not and never will qualify them as "professionals."

veraeikon.bsky.social•4 days ago

I keep saying this and it keeps being true. Literal Nazis get far better treatment at the NYT than trans people.

rhinomni.bsky.social•4 days ago

There’s a reason why I abandoned the NYT as a US news source.

james-h-hart.bsky.social•4 days ago

Or unceremoniously booted, but yeah.

gregmotter.bsky.social•4 days ago

Saw the same thing on a local Fox affiliate news show the other night, was dumbfounded.

notabotme.bsky.social•4 days ago

The tariffs will make it harder for Americans to afford fentanyl.

That's *something*.

retronymous.com•4 days ago

If only the word “pretext” was real

educatoratlarge.bsky.social•4 days ago

https://bsky.app/profile/educatoratlarge.bsky.social/post/3lhr77ma3gk2g

unawarewolf.bsky.social•4 days ago

Unsubscribe. Do it now!

grumdholt.bsky.social•4 days ago

New York Times must be pleased with how well the bear patrol is working.

ablue53.bsky.social•4 days ago

NYT is only good for Broadway and home recipes. Forget serious news. It’s a state run propaganda rag.

hotel-putingrad.bsky.social•4 days ago

And Wordle

dogsdadbod.bsky.social•4 days ago

Why into a career when there are so many volcanoes and geysers around?

catpushmike.bsky.social•4 days ago

The whip-saw effects of his on-again, off-again tariff orders create ripe opportunities for stock market manipulation. The Times should write about that. But maybe find another reporter. This one’s not up to the job.

jim0novak.bsky.social•4 days ago

Likewise, it logically says, Trump APPROVED a month of fentanyl deaths in America — something equally absurd.

nomorexx.bsky.social•4 days ago

Agreed. @nytimes.com sucks. They gave us Trump the first time (her emails)and have pathetically failed us ever since.

stiffelman.bsky.social•4 days ago

Jesus fucking Christ what is happening.

genericuser1234567.bsky.social•4 days ago

Gently? There are careers and industries where this level of incompetence would be considered misconduct

dceiver.bsky.social•4 days ago

perhaps but I don't see the need to be indecorous

sharkman1963.bsky.social•4 days ago

Unless I missed something, the times readership sees right through this shit

chrisker.bsky.social•4 days ago

I understand most people being ignorant of how border checks work. But is it too much to ask the press to explain and continue to explain that Canada check people going to Canada, the US checks the people who come in here, and any fentanyl coming in is our fault?

txo.bsky.social•4 days ago

They have finished building the Rubicon Bridge and now officially opened it to traffic at highway speeds.

rdp2.bsky.social•3 days ago

They could have AT LEAST thrown an “ostensibly” in there, like god damn

dceiver.bsky.social•3 days ago

it's right there!!

outtaflushing.bsky.social•4 days ago

Well, they probably already moonlight as stenographers. Under the circumstances, fentanyl is one of the pretexts Trump often uses and it's too much trouble to go through the changing rationales or to provide some snark with the explanation (too dangerous these days). So they lie.

eruanion.bsky.social•4 days ago

How will they apply tariffs to something that supposedly crosses the border illegally?

dceiver.bsky.social•4 days ago

I think if you really tried to find logic it would be that Canada would somehow feel so motivated to get the tariffs removed that they’d step up the interdiction of fentanyl, the only problem being the lack of actual fentanyl to interdict

dceiver.bsky.social•4 days ago

But the real reason is that the White House is run by mendacious idiots and you have to filter your coverage through that prism to accurately cover it

newmechanicum.bsky.social•4 days ago

like so many other elderly folks in the US, the grey lady has been watching too much fox news and has gone crazy

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply