No response from ZP or CD. The fact its a screen shot from long ago, is inline with his post. It is an example of what he says he was doing, so it tells us nothing either way. If @carladenyer.bsky.social or @zackpolanski.bsky.social don't address it by tomorrow evening, then they lose my subs. - ThreadSky

concerned-person.bsky.social • 38 days ago

No response from ZP or CD. The fact its a screen shot from long ago, is inline with his post. It is an example of what he says he was doing, so it tells us nothing either way. If @carladenyer.bsky.social or @zackpolanski.bsky.social don't address it by tomorrow evening, then they lose my subs.

Comments

zoonie.bsky.social•38 days ago

If they address it, it gives it legitimacy. If he's not even a member of the party and nothing has happened, what have they got to address?

concerned-person.bsky.social•38 days ago

If they don't address it, my inference is it's true and they'd rather court bigots or are afraid of backlash.

zoonie.bsky.social•38 days ago

Well you can take that as you like it, but it's someone not in the party talking about something that didn't happen, so don't be too shocked if it's not top news of the day.

katiefenn.bsky.social•38 days ago

It’s not true. He is lying. Here is a statement from LGBTIQA+ Greens and the Green Party of England and Wales.

https://bsky.app/profile/lgbtiqagreens.bsky.social/post/3lh7o7zz5x22z

bristolsocialist.bsky.social•38 days ago

They'd be better off just treating him as the irrelevance he is to be honest and just not pay any attention to him

katymontgomerie.com•38 days ago

Mate they can't address every insane rumour that the lying GCs make up, come on

concerned-person.bsky.social•38 days ago

Then why did you @ her in the first place. Come on, this is a big one. It needs a response.

sarahviktoria.bsky.social•38 days ago

Membership of diversity schemes is the sort of thing organisations like to be open about - it's part of the point of diversity schemes.

edpoole1975.bsky.social•38 days ago

Leaders are not always at work. They have families and loved ones and other responsibilities, like we all do.
It isn't their role to drop everything and release official.statements everytime someone lies about the Green Party on the internet.
The point is it was a lie, and we can move on.

nicmintginger.bsky.social•38 days ago

If it helps I saw this earlier on Twitter.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bz3HrXAN9io1vC-xxAXULoVEu9xBPERpo_isqqgIbH4/edit?pli=1&tab=t.0

concerned-person.bsky.social•38 days ago

Thanks. That's a bit of a double edged sword for me. The fact it was on Twitter gives me zero confidence in them. But that's not on you, so apologies for my rant and thanks again for your post.

kathrynbristow.uk•38 days ago

I have already been in contact with them, and they also don't know where Shahrar got this from. We are currently trying to figure out if there's any truth to what he is saying.

katymontgomerie.com•38 days ago

He got it from this screenshot. Probably some GC idiot sent it to him. Obviously he didn't fact check it, and neither did a single GC journalist. Lying or stupid or both doesn't matter

concerned-person.bsky.social•38 days ago

They shouldn't need to figure out if there's truth to it. They are the leaders, they should know immediately if this is true. They could at least post something.

kathrynbristow.uk•38 days ago

Our leaders have very little executive power, so had to ensure noone else made that decision, which we now can confirmed they haven't. We have a statement out now.
https://bsky.app/profile/lgbtiqagreens.bsky.social/post/3lh7o7zz5x22z

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply