Why is it ok to demand that maths exam questions have a low literacy demand to make them accessible, assuming we don’t need much language to do maths?
Would anyone accept the same argument in for e.g. history?
Let’s make history accesible by focusing on just the dates &remove all that wordy stuff
Would anyone accept the same argument in for e.g. history?
Let’s make history accesible by focusing on just the dates &remove all that wordy stuff
Comments
(FYI Tasmania Jones or his cousin Victoria Jones used to show up annually, and yes it's a pun on Indiana Jones using Australian states instead of US).
There's also an element that maths isn't just arithmetic - it's about being able to solve numerical or ...
The Finnish example is very interesting.
I had a similar conversation with Sue at RME where I asked her how context could be included in assessment vs literacy demands and got a very similar response!
- Making the language clear and understandable by rephrasing questions can make them more accessible.
- Removing context-specific aspects to reduce the amount of words.
I'd support the former but not the latter.