As I said - this is lame as far as evidence goes.
"sufficient to conclude that at least some of the rights claimed by South Africa and for which it is seeking protection are plausible"
"plausible" is not "this is fact"
like I said I don't even disagree with the claim this is just bad evidence
"sufficient to conclude that at least some of the rights claimed by South Africa and for which it is seeking protection are plausible"
"plausible" is not "this is fact"
like I said I don't even disagree with the claim this is just bad evidence
Comments
And, of course, the mountains of evidence have grown since.
ChatGPT lies to promote genocide
i'm sorry this is just so damn hysterical that it's difficult to take you seriously
like people who seriously call joe biden a "genocidal maniac", it's like ffs give me a break
you're literally doing the thing
If you cannot steelman your opponents' positions and figure out why they're doing what they're doing you're just an idiot
I think Biden was an overall decent president but A) the standards for that are on the floor and B) I/P is the one part of his presidency that was truly and absolute shit, a horrific black mark on an otherwise solid admin
If supporting genocide and/or genociders isn't evil, what is the word reserved for?