Every time DOGE fires many hundreds of federal employees, in any agency, we're told the employees are "non-mission critical including DEI-related positions, among other roles." I don't believe there are that many DEI-related positions in the federal workforce. - ThreadSky

About ThreadSky

solidsignal.bsky.social • 11 days ago

Every time DOGE fires many hundreds of federal employees, in any agency, we're told the employees are "non-mission critical including DEI-related positions, among other roles." I don't believe there are that many DEI-related positions in the federal workforce.

Comments

solidsignal.bsky.social•11 days ago

Obviously, there hasn't been sufficient time to review & understand who is being eliminated, what their jobs entail or what happens, from a system perspective, without them. Show us the flowcharts & AI prompts. Explain in detail how yr thoughtless automated process works, if it's legit, Mr. Genius.

solidsignal.bsky.social•11 days ago

We need to see detailed information on positions being eliminated, job responsibilities, & salaries. This is public information, anyway. Mass firings via unknown AI methods with essentially no explanation other than that bs boilerplate in every press release. How is this tolerable?

solidsignal.bsky.social•11 days ago

Furthermore, we keep hearing that fired employees are "probationary, as if they're new, inexperienced or performing poorly. In reality, the majority are career civil servants who applied for job openings posted internally, & got hired from within for their qualifications & gov experience.

solidsignal.bsky.social•11 days ago

This boilerplate explanation is either a big lie or an assumption that DOGE's untested AI is accurately evaluating positions it deems unnecessary. We already know essential employees have been fired & hastily rehired. And we've seen only the tip of that iceberg.

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply