The regulators have now all been told by Reeves to "drive growth": a preposterous aim for bodies meant to protect us from the deleterious impacts of economic activity. How is this compatible with a framework which will say "in some places we should leave nature alone?"
Comments
After 14+ years of shitwater, I'd take even a negotiated scrap thrown our way.
But it could be more.
(*"mental" appearing 3 times in last bit not deliberate.)