All three power cables between Baltic and Nordic countries were targeted by ship anchors within weeks.
SE govt today stated that anchor tracks believed to be from YI PENG 3 was found by
Nordbalt, the largest one. This was not known previously.
EAGLE S targeted Estlink 1 & 2 and succeeded with 2.
SE govt today stated that anchor tracks believed to be from YI PENG 3 was found by
Nordbalt, the largest one. This was not known previously.
EAGLE S targeted Estlink 1 & 2 and succeeded with 2.
Reposted from
Hans Tino Hansen
The YI PENG 3 was also close to damage the Nordbalt power cable between Sweden and Lithuania Swedish Minister for Civil Defence Carl-Oskar Bohlin informed today.
www.svt.se/nyheter/inri...
www.svt.se/nyheter/inri...
Comments
In case you missed it, from Newsweek.
Sell cargo, let the owners sue.
Then rig them with autopilot and sail straight to Kaliningrad at high speed.
The only pity is a weak response from EU leadership though.
iirc the vessel speeds were also different.
So that when it is time they can deploy 50 correct anchors at correct speeds spread out all across Baltics and North Sea for maximum effect.
6h later there is not much comms or power left.
I’m not suggesting the operations were sophisticated or were planned as an experiment.
What we have seen is that anchor dragging doesn’t consistently cause damage to every cable across which the anchor is dragged.
Much more damage could be caused to comms and power supply.
Ploughing of an existing cable has a high risk of damaging the cable.
It reinforces my point about the futility of trying to provide ‘backup’ to power or comms cables in the GoF with equally vulnerable subsea cables.