The Israeli army is basically admitting to murdering a journalist for “documenting” news. We don’t know what else to say. - ThreadSky

freedom.press • 5 days ago

The Israeli army is basically admitting to murdering a journalist for “documenting” news.

We don’t know what else to say.

Comments

hantoush.bsky.social•5 days ago

For starters, Change the word army to mercenaries.

enigmasystem03.bsky.social•5 days ago

And also, admitting to bombing a hospital, but that's just been par for the course for a while now, sadly.

waynefryback.bsky.social•5 days ago

"Don't let his press vest fool you.."???

Wow... that is ominous as fuck.

carysmiller.bsky.social•5 days ago

📌

punkymaysnark.bsky.social•5 days ago

Still pulling out that "oh the hospital was full of terrorists so it's fine that we destroyed it" chestnut, I see.

sundoesshine.bsky.social•5 days ago

But you dont understand. There was a journalist in that hospital

rollforphobia.bsky.social•5 days ago

It’s really convenient that Israel’s opponents keep using this devious tactic that has never stopped any attack and is indistinguishable from merely existing in a community, but makes everything not Israel’s fault.

rsphillips.bsky.social•5 days ago

The post says “hospital” 🤯

bigmatitus.bsky.social•5 days ago

Trump is getting bad ideas from this

roryr6.bsky.social•5 days ago

If he is a member of hamas then he is fair game

rollforphobia.bsky.social•5 days ago

But he wasn’t.

roryr6.bsky.social•5 days ago

He was a part of a terrorist attack and produced terrorist propaganda. He was not independent, hamas would not allow him to join them on the hint for Jews if he was anything other than a supporter or member

sundoesshine.bsky.social•5 days ago

Really going for the world record for Most Assumptions Strung Together

roryr6.bsky.social•5 days ago

It really, he was allowed by hamas to be on their murder jolly. Do you think hamas lets just anyone film their crimes?

holmskjell.bsky.social•5 days ago

"Terrorism" is by def a crime meant to have an impact on people BEYOND the scope of the initial attack.
So yes: having outsiders see would in fact be part of the point.

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply