Stephen A. Smith, America’s best-known sports-talker, is hosting boldface Democrats and MAGA luminaries and teasing a 2028 presidential run. But what he really wants is ubiquitous political influence, and things of that nature. https://nyti.ms/4mkONs8
Comments
Oh and I can careless about Smith. I'm just pointing out the glaring hypocrisis here
Triggered by hypocrisy?lol
If u don't like it, u can either move along like everyone else or leave an ignore comment,which doesn't create a positive experience.
With that said, I did write it in haste but I really don't care
"Your readers" 🤣 Im not like u. Not here to communicate with people.I have friends
He has no electoral possibilities. But it figures that NYT is profiling him
Bet he sell more papers than the real candidates
You can’t make this stuff up.
🤣😂
What is it with these TV people -
No government or leadership experience, but I can be president. Does a tv camera melt your brain, cause hubris & self aggrandizing beliefs or convince them they are special.
No. Just NO !!!!!!!
So skip the fact that calling democrats "Boldface" means nothing since the formal definition is simply a description of a typeface, HOWEVER given the most common use of that word (the term "boldface lies") is clearly meant to
And "boldfaced" has different meanings. One is being bold and unashamed. I think that describes Booker, Shapiro and Jeffries.
And yes. "MAGA luminaries" is a slam. Speaks to the foolishness of their ecosystem.
Though I did double check meanings on "Boldface" and only found definitions of the typeface.
But you are 100% right, like a fool, I popped off without reading.
And my take is that your solid man for admitting that.
Well done. 👍
Oh.
Two terms it is I guess.
Wake up America.