Thread, Bluesky better for climate content engagement
My question/concern is whether Bluesky has high enough uptake in Oz for the general ease of climate news here to have much impact on #auspol
My question/concern is whether Bluesky has high enough uptake in Oz for the general ease of climate news here to have much impact on #auspol
Reposted from
Katharine Hayhoe
I compared 22 identical climate-related posts on Threads vs Bluesky over the last 3 months, and the difference is shocking.
Normalized engagement on Threads dropped nearly 2/3 + my following dropped, while Bluesky engagement held steady + following quadrupled.
Whatβs driving this?
Read on! π§΅
Normalized engagement on Threads dropped nearly 2/3 + my following dropped, while Bluesky engagement held steady + following quadrupled.
Whatβs driving this?
Read on! π§΅
Comments
Growing steadily here.
Do you really want to be bombarded with [redacted]?
#AusPol #AusClimate
That's a good article, which afaict doesn't apply to KH.
Prejudice and hypocrisy? I'm being blunt and truthful.
Shame she can't too.
But your comment had prejudice and hypocrisy, neither directness or truth telling requires either
No, that's experience - prove anything that I've said wrong, because it's not my opinion, that's the truth.
I can see I've hit a nerve, so I'll leave you to it, but now you know :)
Comes out swinging, but question your own use of prejudice you fall back on I'm blunt/ debate me/hit a nerve/exit
To cast your prejudice and hypocrisy as social justice/ clever posting
Now I know you use that style of interaction to excuse your prejudice