On a day after Christmas, the NY Times challenged the universe administration to do better than tsunamis. God did not respond but sources close to them say "We considered the Great Flood 2.0 but competition is too high", followed by "We still dominate plagues and asteroids, so this is on the table"
I've invented a new tsunami that's guided by generative AI that will specifically seek out the artists whose work it's trained on so they won't be able to sue over the plagiarized murals commemorating their tragic deaths.
When this happened, I said one of the reasons this hit so hard was because of the loss of mangrove swamps along the coast, that act as a natural barrier to flooding from storm surges and tsunamis.
BUT that is the reason. I remember a tsunami in SE Asia. Mangrove swamps removed for luxury hotels. Not insensitive, just realistic. Many of the lost lives were due to manmade situations. But we mustn't talk about that. Gotta have those luxury spas and hotels! Money money money.
I wrote this headline about the decision to allow pro basketball players to compete in the ‘92 Games and didn’t realize what I’d done till I saw it on newsstand. Haunted to this day. Shit happens.
Comments
Na, it's the NYT.
We can make the tsunamis WAY more fucked up to deal with.
I was yelled at for being "insensitive".
A Mass Deportation plan by Trump might be the catalyst to kill even MORE people than last time.
Oh wait. Nevermind. 🤔