Remote interviews are not going to be useful anymore, joining a long list of talent identification techniques that AI is invalidating (like take-home essays, etc.).
I don’t think institutions are adjusting fast enough.
I don’t think institutions are adjusting fast enough.
1 / 2
Comments
You’re not going to get a lot of data out of having live exercises with such tooling.
But talking to people and judging their answers is going to be more helpful I believe.
If the test is a good predictor of job performance, and they can ace the test with AI, should they also not be able to ace the job with AI?
Maybe the problem here is that using AI is consider cheating?
https://github.com/ibttf/interview-coder
It might very well be that a coding assistent is going to help people pass a live exercise.
But talking about past projects in detail, culture, experience is a different signal and needs different skills.
Not too concerned as of now.
2) show revisions.
Very hard to hide AI.
https://bsky.app/profile/soumitrashukla.bsky.social/post/3lifdjudrys2h
Because if you hire them, a copilot can help with the simple stuff anyway.