ThreadSky
About ThreadSky
Log In
wbianco.bsky.social
•
3 days ago
Interesting. Didn't look deep enough on the court cases. Re slow-walking, is this a case where the initial legislation was considered overly broad, at least post-hoc?
Comments
Log in
with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
[–]
elizabethbitmeehan.com
•
3 days ago
(1) FinCEN chose to do both an ANPRM and a PNRM and split it across 3 separate rulemakings
(2) a lot of the complexities that were considered for the bill itself were excluded and kicked to rule making - it was not new ground
(3) the first proposed bill was in 2008 & many versions adressed issues
2
reply
Posting Rules
Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service
×
Reply
Post Reply
Comments
(2) a lot of the complexities that were considered for the bill itself were excluded and kicked to rule making - it was not new ground
(3) the first proposed bill was in 2008 & many versions adressed issues