I will be cross-referencing the email exchange to show that Jesse's article was published while knowing with absolute certainty that the underlying narrative of the article is false. Serano's emails will be bordered in red, Singal's article will be bordered in blue. Others will have a green border.
Comments
Seems to me that an honest person would say upfront that the report they were defending was so flawed that it resulted in a settlement like this.
the settlement was surrounding a single false accusation of zucker degrading a trans man, and some minor errors in describing individual patient interactions
the reporting on his clinical practices was not retracted
Fantastic start, Jesse.
Jesus fucking Christ, what the fuck?!
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kenneth-Zucker/publication/14488780_Physical_attractiveness_of_girls_with_gender_identity_disorder/links/56cbea3e08aee3cee54196d7/Physical-attractiveness-of-girls-with-gender-identity-disorder.pdf
Also, this somehow isn't considered distribution of child pornography. What's going on, Ontario?
As “wtf” as this is, this isn’t surprising to see. At all.
(It did allege that Zucker asked intrusive sexual questions; and pressured a trans boy to remove his shirt in front of clinicians.)
Accessibility is everyone's responsibility.
Feels like common sense, which I guess is really telling about accessibility stuff.
If it was ever going to work, it would have by now.
Manipulative crap, but for a reader, potentially effective manipulative crap.