While the piece presents evidence this Adrian Dittman is possibly connected to the account, it stops short of proving Elon Musk is not—hence the hedging below—and doesn’t address why “Dittman” has used first person talking about Musk and *many* other factors leading people to believe it is Musk.
1/
1/
Reposted from
Jacqueline Sweet
SCOOP: Sorry everyone, Adrian Dittmann X most likely is not Elon Musk's alt. It appears Adrian Dittmann is...Adrian Dittmann.
My story here:
thespectator.com/topic/real-a...
My story here:
thespectator.com/topic/real-a...
Comments
Got any leads on these false flag/psy-op "terror attacks"?
It is interesting but inconclusive.
2/
Non-paywalled link:
https://archive.is/Dj4kJ
Clearly, part of the story has been 'habilitating' Musk with the White Supremacist/Christian Nationalist faction(s) Jones cultivates and grifts from.
Sharing accounts/alts isn’t uncommon in the world of trolling and online ops, a world Musk inhabits.
The piece raises more questions than it answers.
3/
He also owns X and has unlimited resources.
Multiple scenarios are possible.
4/
The mindfuck is the point.
5/
When you’re at home on ketamine and ramped up, you don’t hold the same relative public speaking nerves (Musk is afraid of public speaking). Zero doubt.