Maybe rethink your principle. The system we had limited our government, which has lead to poorer outcomes in general for our people. No universal healthcare, poor outcomes. Local public schools starved of funds, poor outcomes. No federal energy policy, poor outcomes.
Comments
Once you understand the limitations of Universal Healthcare as implemented in the UK or Canada I don't think you will support it.
What about those forced to get procedure X when Y was a better choice for them but not an option for their country? What does your "research" say about that? Nothing. Because you can't track data that doesn't exist.
My experience is only with prostate cancer and BPH.
I'm sure for everyday conditions and proactive testing universal coverage would be fine.
I would certainly support some sort of hybrid system