yeah id never heard of this guy at all or seen their posts directly, but have seen like 6 different ones posted as images to dunk on them lmao, this site's block tool is pretty good and we gotta use it on dweebs more liberally instead of spreading stuff around
Yeah! They've created him! Their outrage over his horrible posts feeds him and platforms him like some incredibly lame version of a soul eater or misery maw.
idk op ed writers aren’t just some guys, but they aren’t also mega lex luthors either. they simultaneously help produce the culture that dictates their work. i agree we should ignore him, but i gotta bully every now and then 😈
By the way if this is popular rhetoric with "liberals," it is inherently a non-liberal and non-centrist belief.
A liberal/centrist would argue that the only truth is one that is based on popular arbitration. Ignoring "the left" would inherently mean they aren't reaching the truth, but rather...
Seems like a rule of thumb for people who don't like to think, )Ike how they've turned Occam's razor into "whatever is simplest (i.e. easiest for me to believe) must be the truth"
He's rage baiting you all into platforming him. And it's working because you're falling for it. Blissfully pretend he simply doesn't exist. I'm doing it right now. Wow, in this universe I am now in, there is no such guy named Will's Stencil. We've never heard of him over in this universe. It's nice!
I'm hearing I'm being sub tweeted by some real cool guys for not following the correct steps or appropriate etiquette for talking shit about someone on BlueSky. I guess those real cool guys better go do some standup or podcasts about it I guess.
yeah its the same shit as tim pool and that indonesian guy and even jordan peterson, they all know they get $$ based on engagement. I don't know how it applies here (twitter pays directly)
Comments
A liberal/centrist would argue that the only truth is one that is based on popular arbitration. Ignoring "the left" would inherently mean they aren't reaching the truth, but rather...
I don't know what this new ideology is, but it can't really be described with traditional labels. Kinda similar to MAGA in that way.
Seems like a rule of thumb for people who don't like to think, )Ike how they've turned Occam's razor into "whatever is simplest (i.e. easiest for me to believe) must be the truth"
Kurt Schlicter or somethin....
Wheeee.
he's a worthless distraction who needs engagement to make him relevant and keep him relevant
Like he has to be, no?