How to assess the literature on climate change when it grows exponentially? But do we need to assess it all, or just the most relevant parts?
Figure from https://www.nature.com/articles/s44168-023-00072-3, in our npj Climate Action Special Collection on the #IPCC https://www.nature.com/collections/gfcdgaghjd
Figure from https://www.nature.com/articles/s44168-023-00072-3, in our npj Climate Action Special Collection on the #IPCC https://www.nature.com/collections/gfcdgaghjd
Comments
Personally I think we should focus on the most relevant parts, and do the hard work of winnowing to the most crucial bits. Otherwise, the task is unworkable, the product unwieldy.
Diminishing returns setting in
Even 10 towns of 25,000 people achieving #NetZero
would be living proof low demand/lowimpact
= higher probability of human future
To achieve higher levels of Honesty and Responsibility
we need smaller habitats and less complex cultures
"Briefing" https://bit.ly/3Wws1mf
Many people can find contentment/quality of life while consuming much less material goods/ecological services. Limiting desires at “root” saves much trouble re symptoms (of unrestrained, or unexamined desires) as they materialize worldwide. Benefits of spiritual teachings often get overlooked.
Climate Papers was a python script showing bsky posts with links to climate papers.
People like @glenpeters.bsky.social
@katharinehayhoe.com found it useful.
Could you implement a copy please?
https://app.bsky.cz/profile/katharinehayhoe.com/post/3laegc4ow272g