On the intention point, AI in itself does not have intention, but the art it produces is the result of intention - that's how training and prompting works.
On the natural point, something isn't good or better because it is "natural" vs something "unnatural". This is first-year philosophy.
On the natural point, something isn't good or better because it is "natural" vs something "unnatural". This is first-year philosophy.
Comments
Can we not just say "AI art looks like shit, large TTI models are trained on plagiarised data, and should not be replacing human talent" instead of this navel-gazing bollocks about why AI art isn't art?