1/2) No, @marossefcovic.bsky.social: #EUtrade with #Israel 's illegal settlements is NOT "overall consistent" with the obligations laid out by the #ICJ
It's not about trade preferences: international law requires a *blanket ban* on trade & business with settlements: https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/10/25/international-court-rulings-require-eu-action-israel-and-palestine ...
It's not about trade preferences: international law requires a *blanket ban* on trade & business with settlements: https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/10/25/international-court-rulings-require-eu-action-israel-and-palestine ...
Comments
Also, the EU27 repeatedly said settlements are "illegal under int'l law" and "an obstacle to peace / two state solution". Then why trade with them, contributing to underlying abuses?
Action needed, @vonderleyen.ec.europa.eu