Interesting assessment of the quality of some hydrological models. It relates well to my earlier comment on Python packages for hydrology, where quality (and maintenance) is a clear issue that needs to be addressed (which probably equals more funding needed for research software development 😅)
Reposted from
Robert Reinecke
Global impact models are pivotal for science, but how good is the software of these models?
Many models are inaccessible, have sub-optimal code comment density, and must be more modular!
Find out more:
gmd.copernicus.org/articles/17/...
Many models are inaccessible, have sub-optimal code comment density, and must be more modular!
Find out more:
gmd.copernicus.org/articles/17/...
Comments