Do you not see a problem with the stigmatising and derogatory language used in the paper? Or the statement (using questionable evidence) that chippies are a 'marker of low educational attainment'? All this against a background of long-standing epistemic violence against working-class people/places.
To say that the language in the paper is "stigmatising and derogatory" is absurd. You also misquote the article. What bothers me most is that you call for a paper to be withdrawn and apologised for because you don't like it.
Comments