I've said it before and I'll say it again If any slashfilm/screenrant/shovelblog shitty website says an element in a newly release movie "isn't CGI" THEY LITERALLY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT - ThreadSky

About ThreadSky

tvaziri.com • 148 days ago

I've said it before and I'll say it again

If any slashfilm/screenrant/shovelblog shitty website says an element in a newly release movie "isn't CGI" THEY LITERALLY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT

Comments

bodammer.bsky.social•147 days ago

@tvaziri.com - if you had to estimate how many scenes in a movie have some level of CGI, what percentage would you say? I’ve seen BTS clips of movies where the background of random, mundane exterior shot is actually all CGI. And any casual viewer would never notice that it’s fake…

tvaziri.com•147 days ago

there's no way to estimate but I'd guarantee that it's far larger than the regular audience member thinks

ihnatko.bsky.social•17 days ago

T2 made me realize and accept that I know nothing. I smugly thought "That doesn't look like greenscreen. Cameron likes rear projection...I bet he shot the T1000 live in Super 35 in front of Sarah Connor on a Vistavision backplate." Then I read in Cinefex that Linda Hamilton has an identical twin...

w2aps.bsky.social•17 days ago

The only people I trust on this on YouTube are the Corridor Digital crew. Always excellent proper analysis from them.

themovierabbithole.bsky.social•147 days ago

What do you mean?!

violetsneeded.bsky.social•148 days ago

Holy shit....Film snobs (on Twitter, no idea of here) are the vegans of movie talk. They only accept practical and avoid computer stuff like the plague.

siretchasketch.bsky.social•148 days ago

but what if they planted 9 Million Tulips Todd.

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply