If blatantly committing genocide to keep yourself out of prison, while the Western world's governents and media give you bipartisan support doesn't swing it for you, I don't know what will.
Have I missed something? Because I thought all that had happened to her of note this year was her cancer diagnosis and treatment, which she's understandably been fairly private about.
If she'd done something to show us 'how the sausage gets made' about cancer treatments, I'd kinda understand it...
Me: "If you understand what Time Person of the Year actually is"
A bunch of replies: *go in all guns blazing despite clearly not understanding what Time Person of the Year actually is*
I fully and unashamedly admit I’ve no clue what it actually is, is it something to do with influence? (This is like a particularly difficult hignfy odd one out round).
Comments
FTFY
If she'd done something to show us 'how the sausage gets made' about cancer treatments, I'd kinda understand it...
But also, why does that make her noteworthy?
https://time.com/archive/6598257/adolf-hitler-man-of-the-year-1938/
A bunch of replies: *go in all guns blazing despite clearly not understanding what Time Person of the Year actually is*
It's purely based on influence, 'better or worse'
I feel Gisèle Pelicot should definitely have been considered. But perhaps we don't yet know what changes her case will lead to...