That's fully against the second amendment. I know he's crazy enough to go for it but even a conservative congress and Senate will have no part in that.
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
The closest any of those articles mention what you said about getting rid of free speech on SM platforms:
“Digital platforms should only qualify for immunity protection under Section 230 if they meet high standards of neutrality, transparency, fairness and nondiscrimination,”
I had hoped I would get some kind of apology for how you attacked me and my character. With that said my concern was around the 5 minute mark he talks about congress passing a Digital Bill of Rights. Digital due process can be tricky if evenly enforced.
The video you sent had the description that he had posted it to his Twitter yesterday (not his truth social a year and a half ago) and the audio was very off sync. Even with the best interpretation, it's still incredibly misleading.
This is one of those times I actually agree with him (not that I think he will actually do it right).
We all agree the social media giants are horseshit. It's why we came to a decentralized platform. The Twitter files were disgusting and the Biden admin being in with Twitter was unconstitutional af
Comments
I hope someone's paying you for going through this much effort to lie.
https://nypost.com/2022/12/15/trump-vows-to-ban-feds-from-id-ing-domestic-misinformation-if-elected/
“Digital platforms should only qualify for immunity protection under Section 230 if they meet high standards of neutrality, transparency, fairness and nondiscrimination,”
Genuinely, watch the video and remove the hatred of Trump and replace it with your hatred of social media and see how much of it you disagree with.
We all agree the social media giants are horseshit. It's why we came to a decentralized platform. The Twitter files were disgusting and the Biden admin being in with Twitter was unconstitutional af