Stansbury: Let’s take the argument to its logical extension that this is about making sure we have qualified individuals inside the federal government. My question is then why is the president-elect choosing absolutely unqualified cabinet secretaries to be at the head of every single agency?
Comments
Adversarial leadership is a good move.
Ah, to destroy the faith in them, to center all power under the orange god king Pharaoh.
Imagine. Logic.
😳
None of them are qualified to do anything but stand in front of a crowd and lie. That is why we have career public servants under them to actually run things.
This is the maga version on Little Red Riding Hood, except the wolf is the hero.
Is the goal to run these agencies efficiently, or is the goal to tear down and destroy these agencies?
Do some of these agencies DESERVE to be destroyed?
The problem is that they're ideologically inclined and predisposed to undermine the reasons why the agencies they're going to lead exist in the first place.
Donnie, of course, will demand his cut of the take.
How will we respond to Trump the dictator & his insane posse?
Deal with it!
Only time will tell how it plays out in real life.
1. Have more money than God.
2. Kiss Dear Leader's ass.
Jennifer Granholm was qualified to be Energy Secretary?
Jared Bernstein was qualified to be the top White House economist?
Most of the Biden Cabinet was filled with people who did not have any experience in their respective fields.