I'm sure you didnt mean any harm but AI including Google's AI is not always factually correct, even if it cites its sources. Tbh, wikipedia is better than the AI explanation. Just be careful!! ^^
Never used a LLM, ever. I don't see the point. They just churn out gibberish in accordance to what it *thinks* sounds right. I've seen too much made up nonsense to trust them.
I admit, I refuse to touch ChatGPT or other similar services for fear that it'll give me the wrong information. Too badly burned out by finding sites with the wrong info, so I've been hesitant
You're taking the right approach. ChatGPT is trained to write things that look like the response you would get, not to actually give you information. Use actual sources, and evaluate them critically.
Today: man + woman looking at plants. Man says "i wouldnt know where to put them" woman says " I'll take some pictures and run them through chatGPT for ideas"
I wonder to myself, how I could have become a god if only I was not tempted by the fruit of curiosity. I fell on the sword when I searched up synonyms for elegance.
Domain expansion...... I touch grass, when activated it forces every sweat in a 300 mile radius to be so disgusted that their actively repulled away and fall like a goober
The only time I ever used an LLM was to run an essay through trying to figure out if it was written by chatgpt. Looking back it was kinda obvious bc of how much everything was jumbled together and repetitive in it.
π€¦ββοΈ Sorry, I didn't quite understand the verb "redraw."
I assume the original (the smoking issue) is yours.
The reason for my question is the signature. I wanted to suggest you sign it so I can share it without losing the credit, link, and whatever else you want.
Tbh I felt conflicted abt signage cause the redraw for the meme is fairly close to the original source material. My sona is enough of a signature for me but yeah I did redraw the entire thing by hand.
augh... the damn line between plagiarism and derivative work.
Hmm, let's see. I think the concept of a derivative work as a meme is clear, and on the other hand, you probably wouldn't have told me the way you did.
+
What about something like "Original: [?]; redrawn and reinterpreted by ToriPng"? "Original: [?]; redraw & reconcept by ToriPng"?
(I don't know how to say it better in english and country.)
I think for native English speakers the original caption makes clear enough that the redraw was done by the poster, and the lack of signature indicates that they don't particularly want explicit credit.
I recall complaining on a forum that I didn't have time to properly plan meals or a shopping list, and someone came months later and said to use chat gpt. Like I'd literally rather eat pasta the rest of my life than let a robot decide what I should make.
When AI was first becoming a thing, I thought it was neat and didnt realize how damaging it would become, so I did use things like characterai and at one point an image generator, but I am proud to say I've never touched chatgpt
I can also proclaim this but I wish I could be able to say I haven't used AI at all, unfortunately I was actually a pioneer in ai by having extensively played AI Dungeon in the past, before AI "got good".
Comments
Me: π
My shop is open rn and I have no cons this month so I'm linking it here:
https://shop.toripng.com/
π€
It's yours?
I assume the original (the smoking issue) is yours.
The reason for my question is the signature. I wanted to suggest you sign it so I can share it without losing the credit, link, and whatever else you want.
Hmm, let's see. I think the concept of a derivative work as a meme is clear, and on the other hand, you probably wouldn't have told me the way you did.
+
(I don't know how to say it better in english and country.)
Not like i haven't at all, I've got the lore but stuff like lil docx stories and such i gotta come up with for once
It took me quite a bit to realize people don't accept justifications of any kind, but yea, sounds fair