This is a thing I don’t think the AI adopters don’t understand: you’re not getting a *good* story when you use it. You’re getting a story that a good editor, even if they approved of AI, would almost certainly reject.
Reposted from
Uncanny Magazine
Since the AI posts are still rolling, here are some hopefully final clarifications.
1- Uncanny hasn't rejected a story because we suspected AI use. These stories were rejected for the usual reasons we would pass on a story.
1- Uncanny hasn't rejected a story because we suspected AI use. These stories were rejected for the usual reasons we would pass on a story.
Comments