And meanwhile in the UK...
You know that thing made of copper that you can string directly above a railway track, and *is proven to have worked for more than a hundred years*
Ah no
https://www.railwaygazette.com/uk/class-60-steam-loco-conversion-decision-expected-soon/68337.article
You know that thing made of copper that you can string directly above a railway track, and *is proven to have worked for more than a hundred years*
Ah no
https://www.railwaygazette.com/uk/class-60-steam-loco-conversion-decision-expected-soon/68337.article
Comments
That and fear of ugly wires hurting properly prices is probably where they got their funding
https://www.kreisbote.de/lokales/allgaeu/akku-zuege-statt-wasserstoff-neue-plaene-auf-bahnstrecken-in-schwaben-93594212.html
Man, VC funding for wild ideas is absurd sometimes. Just give it to NR to electrify the rail more.
I ponder if I can get VC funding for people-powered engines.. *thinks*
https://www.energymonitor.ai/tech/electrification/how-india-made-45-of-its-railway-network-electric-in-just-five-years/?cf-view
(did I really understand the plan? generate steam by burning H₂, not even using a fuel cell to have yet another possible factor of failure?)
Caternary is hugely expensive to both build and maintain, and is an eyesore
Hydrogen rail is everywhere, as is the use of hydrogen to replace diesel and other fuels in all sectors
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mariannelehnis/2024/09/27/spain-builds-worlds-first-high-speed-hydrail-train/
Very interested to hear your response
It might have applications elsewhere, but I do not see them in rail.
Hydrogen is used throughout the rail system, globally
"The loco could use green hydrogen produced using renewable energy."
To then heat water, drive a turbine, lose loads of energy on the way and drive the train?
Alternatively one could charge a battery, or power and overhead line.