If improving the quality of legislators is more important than that, the role has to be made more attractive. I don't support the call for raising MPs' salaries. I do think offering more support to ex-MPs would encourage more people to interrupt their careers to do the role. - ThreadSky

alastairmeeks.bsky.social • 20 days ago

If improving the quality of legislators is more important than that, the role has to be made more attractive. I don't support the call for raising MPs' salaries. I do think offering more support to ex-MPs would encourage more people to interrupt their careers to do the role.

Comments

grahamwalkernrg.bsky.social•20 days ago

And I think there are at least two misconceptions here - that (primarily or only) people with "careers" are "quality" candidates, and that people with careers don't currently interrupt their careers to be MPs, whereas they manifestly do all the time.

grahamwalkernrg.bsky.social•20 days ago

The vast majority of working people in the UK would be increasing their pay and pensions drastically if they became MPs. If the existing social safety net is not enough for MPs, guess what? They can increase the social safety net for everyone, rather than just themselves.

alastairmeeks.bsky.social•20 days ago

There are a lot of people with careers. Some of those could be capable MPs. A high proportion of those are put off by job insecurity (leaving only zealots or nutters willing to interrupt their current careers).

I'll let you draw your own Venn diagrams so you can see where you erred in that tweet.

grahamwalkernrg.bsky.social•20 days ago

I'd rather see you evidence your statement that "only zealots and nutters" are willing to interrupt their "careers", when the average male salary is 1/3rd of base MPs' pay. 23% of MPs went to Oxbridge and 20% private school, it rather suggesting other factors are significantly more important.

alastairmeeks.bsky.social•20 days ago

*gestures at the House of Commons*

grahamwalkernrg.bsky.social•20 days ago

Cool, so what your saying is you have no evidence that "a high proportion of people are put off by the job insecurity"? Are you seriously telling me that someone on average salary wouldn't grab the chance to earn £93k for potentially five years with both hands?

grahamwalkernrg.bsky.social•20 days ago

Never mind one of the 1 million people on a zero hours contract? Or would they not be quality candidates by definition?

alastairmeeks.bsky.social•20 days ago

As a matter of simple observation, the fact that so few engage with the political process in that way strongly suggests that no they wouldn't.

Unfortunately, I must now crack on with the dayjob.

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply