@nytimes.com another bad Alzheimer piece. Citing a study with negative primary endpoints as encouraging, mistaking prevention for treatment, puffing up an uncertain mechanism. How about lean into our ignorance until semaglutide reads out?
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/31/well/mind/ozempic-alzheimers.html?unlocked_article_code=1.tk4.qTao.ruZAt_xZFVNy&smid=bs-share
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/31/well/mind/ozempic-alzheimers.html?unlocked_article_code=1.tk4.qTao.ruZAt_xZFVNy&smid=bs-share
Comments
There may be benefit, but I suspect nowhere near as large as is being reported.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474442220301733?via%3Dihub
Looking forward to the EVOKE trial results.
Bottom line is that we don’t know until we have real data.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)02808-3/fulltext
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/04/health/parkinsons-disease-exenatide-byetta.html