Seeing some funny revisionism with the history of Civ reviews, folk claiming they always score low but are still loved by fans at launch.
Metacritic for Civ 6 was 88, 5 was 90, 4 was 94. It's the community that then generally compares them unfavorably to the previous game until expansions arrive.
Metacritic for Civ 6 was 88, 5 was 90, 4 was 94. It's the community that then generally compares them unfavorably to the previous game until expansions arrive.
Comments
https://www.metacritic.com/search/civilization/
People not immediately migrating over to the newest one full-time is a real thing, but to say "I won't listen to the reviews because they always hate it" is provably false.