A principle that you’re unwilling to make sacrifices to defend isn’t a principle; it’s a convenience.
Reposted from
KSV
Is this what you want your legacy to be, law firms? Pandering to this? Clients come and go but integrity is forever.
Comments
“If it were just me I would act but I must think of the other stakeholders” is the lie that allows their head to rest quietly on their pillow.
Is that were Legal World wants to end up?
Those who accede always believe, mistakenly, they will be spared.
They won't.
In doing so, they betray their oaths, colleagues, profession, nation, Constitution and integrity.
Quislings, collaborators and cowards.
Shame.
I explained she may _like_ local control, but it wasn't a "principle".
Why are they not standing against the storm.
If he "wins", their livelihoods are likely over anyway.
Should it not be:
"A principle that you’re willing to make sacrifices to defend isn’t a principle; it’s a convenience."
If it's a principle, it should not be comprisable.
You should be *un*willing to make compromises about your principles, no?