People who only read Volume 1 often see Marxism as simply being about recognising the fact of surplus value existing

It can therefore lead people to accept capitalism, so long as workers have relatively high wages & a "safety net", without acknowledging its crisis tendencies & general instability
I think a lot of the stodginess comes from the fact that he only wrote one volume of Capital in his lifetime, leaving notes for two more that would be assembled after his death.

He planned to write eight in total, spanning the whole gamut of society from the state, to trade, to organised religion.

Comments