Half of the sycophants in leadership positions were extremely vocal critics 4, 8 years ago. But then somehow, miraculously, they all had Road to Damascus moments and saw the light. Hallelujah!
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
I think these types of questions are too much to unpack on social media. so much room for semantic issues. For example, this sounds *to me* like the very definition of a coalition. It's written like an appeal to hypocrisy, but I thought we all agreed hypocrisy in politics died years ago
I also feel like the trap Dem strategists fell into, years ago, was expanding the tent to embrace more Republican-inclined voters. Reduced their influence on GOP primaries, but created a Democratic party that did not agree about policy goals, could only work tactically as an electoral operation.
It is wild watching the Canadian Liberals smoothly transition into opposing him, because our system is built around the existence and importance of a Loyal Opposition whose entire job is to shit on the Prime Minister with great abandon
Democrats need the senate to get anything done, and the only democrats that have been able to win elections in rural states are center right ones who don’t support progressive policy.
Progressives need to figure out how to win in states like West Virginia if they want to get anything done.
Comments
Brits even more so
Meanwhile Dems think "bipartisan" exists
Progressives need to figure out how to win in states like West Virginia if they want to get anything done.