ThreadSky
About ThreadSky
Log In
eugene290390.bsky.social
•
30 days ago
Banned words from government documents and communications. How's that for "free speech"?!
Comments
Log in
with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
[–]
justanotherdawn.bsky.social
•
30 days ago
Hang on, they've banned they and them? How does that work?
1
reply
[–]
kchasse.bsky.social
•
30 days ago
Wow that's disturbing 🤬
1
reply
[–]
alqalaqat.bsky.social
•
29 days ago
Wow. That takes a lot of words out of the language. Leaving a lot of negative concepts still available.
1
reply
[–]
phbos.bsky.social
•
29 days ago
Doesn’t make sense. Women? Where did this list come from? Source?
1
1
reply
[–]
eugene290390.bsky.social
•
29 days ago
The New York Times. Combined words cannot be used in tandem, but may be used separately. And the edict is not a legal ban, but a "strong" suggestion to limit their usage as much as possible.
0
reply
[–]
mdwth.bsky.social
•
30 days ago
They've spent do many years instilling FEAR in people they've become paranoid..... they're so damn weak & pathetic
1
reply
[–]
ben-dover2k.bsky.social
•
28 days ago
Hmmm, I don't see narcissist, pedophile or snowflake... 🤔
1
reply
Posting Rules
Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service
×
Reply
Post Reply
Comments