The fact that the New York Times feels the need to add "regardless of which party is in office" shows that it fundamentally still doesn't understand the threat it, the media and our country faces.
Reposted from Brian Stelter
NYT rebutting Trump's latest attack against Maggie Haberman and Peter Baker: "Intimidation tactics against Times reporters or their family members have never caused us to back down from our mission of holding powerful people to account, regardless of which party is in office."

Comments