an accurate description of donald trump's character is per se libel. an accurate description of his policies is a call for revolution. one of his great superpowers is that he generates self-censoring facts.
Reposted from
rev. howard arson
even with a single layer of indirection, talking about this seems unsafe, but the entire rule limiting how heated rhetoric can get serves as a curb on discussing what is happening honestly.
Comments
combine with the threats to sue media, papers, etc
help create a reality distortion field (something … I can not nail down like quantity of how much, or quality of how large)
Someone want to tell me they couldn't do that to Trump with "rapist and felon"?