Court says the Office of Personnel Management’s new director must testify in the case alleging the mass firing of probationary fed’l employees was illegal, violating the requirement that there be specific, individualized justifications for each firing.
Reposted from
Kyle Cheney
JUST IN: A judge in California rejects DOJ demand tha the call off live testimony form OPM director Charles EZELL Thursday about the mass firing of probationary employees.
If Ezell doens't show, "then the Court will have to decide the sanction." storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
If Ezell doens't show, "then the Court will have to decide the sanction." storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Comments
What I'm getting at..They might try to cushion the consequences with that.
Criminal contempt. Then what?
TESTIFYING!!
You MOFOs
better start kicking ass!
America is under assualt!
Somehow. Anyhow.
Federal law is enforced by.....U.S. Marshalls?
Recently, I was forced to sue a contractor for negligence, in state court. Sheriff enforced payment.
Another chapter in the
ffotus COMEDY CHRONICLES
This one is entitled BABBLING BUFFOONS
part 155
https://bsky.app/profile/nationalsecuritylaw.org/post/3lk4g6l3rf22o
Orange DicKtator LIES and says he is no longer swayed by the stock markets
🤣🤣🤣🤣 We ALL know that is a crock
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g7vq29g74o.amp
nothing but
Sanctions...
nothing but
Sanctions
do I smell.
I've been wishful of seeing the people who stayed on to do the Wacked Witch of the White House's bidding fined and referred to their state bar for being such naughty naughty officers of the court.
Make ‘em squirm.