What Judge Boasberg really needed was to be included in the Signal chat.
Reposted from
Joshua J. Friedman
NEW: The Trump administration invokes the state-secrets privilege, saying it will give Judge Boasberg no more information about deportation flights to inform his decision about whether the gov't defied his orders storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Comments
But then again pretty much everything they do is a mistake.
Has the Trump administration invoked it in this case to conceal legitimate national security information?
Or to avoid accountability for government actions?
#DefendDueProcess
Force them to use the facts to defend themselves in court trying to overturn your ruling!!
If you can put anyone is jail.....DO IT!!!
REMOVE THE ROT
Example: listen to this brief clip of bullshit evasiveness before the DC Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday:
They refuse to divulge what time the planes took off, even though landing time is public.
Factually.
10 seconds into the recording. I’m not kidding.
This is the DC Circuit Court of Appeals.
Right below SCOTUS.
At 35 seconds into the clip.
Again, NOT KIDDING.
OMG, the irony of this statement in light of Hegseth’s Signal chat debacle.
So guess you'll indict YOURSELF, Trumpleshit, for misusing and spreading Top Secret documents amongst your billionaire friends AND foreign agents. AND for letting Hegseth spread war attack information on an unsecure LINE!!!
Any takers ??????
hypocrisy lies with irony dead no traces too weak to learn
the ashes of democracy lie instate humiliated with no urn
betrayed the people have no clothes but lots of heads to burn
if we do not rise for this what are we but fools
#HCK
All that judicial restraint has wasted time and gotten nothing from the DOJ.
Enough is enough already with the “no accountability clause” that seems to be everywhere.
Everyone else is 😵💫
Who is writing this shit?
And isn’t DELIBERATELY avoiding foia by using SIGNAL illegal?