Savvy of the DPP to get in front of the questions early before someone thought to ask why they charged her anyway when the original investigator looked at the same video and recommended no charges, only to turn around and drop the charges for what appears to be the same reasons.
Reposted from
fwiwblog
Note that the DPP didn't say specifically what changed between the preliminary review and the one that inspired his decision to discontinue the case.
Because, according to the Newsday article, they had the footage when the investigator recommended exoneration BEFORE they charged her.
Because, according to the Newsday article, they had the footage when the investigator recommended exoneration BEFORE they charged her.
Comments