You can hate the messenger, but broadly-worded legislation referring to nebulous concepts like speech that's "prejudicial to public order" 𝘪𝘴 vulnerable to being abused by those inclined to abuse it.
And the organisation empowered by it has a history of abusing its authority.
And the organisation empowered by it has a history of abusing its authority.
Reposted from
fwiwblog
The gag is that he's not wrong, but to challenge specific parts of the SoE regulations for being unconstitutional is kind of funny given that the overall point of the SoE is to suspend constitutional rights.
Comments