Introducing deep funding. Two key ideas:
1. Value as a graph: instead of asking "how much did X contribute to humanity?", ask "how much of the credit for Y belongs to X?"
2. Distilled human judgement: an open market of AIs fills in all weights, human jury randomly spot-checks them
https://deepfunding.org
1. Value as a graph: instead of asking "how much did X contribute to humanity?", ask "how much of the credit for Y belongs to X?"
2. Distilled human judgement: an open market of AIs fills in all weights, human jury randomly spot-checks them
https://deepfunding.org
Comments
Participation is all it takes.
Trickle-up
Me rewriting (letting Copilot rewrite) my code comments in the style of Linus Torvalds so the arbiter model thinks my code is more important.
Me haphazardly reimplementing my dependencies so I don't have to share.
Still curious to see how it works out, cautiously optimistic
Vitalik, you did so much in the effort of creating blockchain standards, starting far before Ethereum began. I was trying to envision what this graph might look like for ERC-20, and the countless other standards you’ve helped pioneer.
Recipients would need to pay tax in most countries.
Many in Germany -big problem.
Crypto projects funding other crypto projects & DAO control - tax wise management & control... who funds whom - potentially tax fraud in most countries -