None of those sites is particularly suitable on technical grounds, especially as they don't want new transmission lines.
The fact they won't consider other locations just shows they aren't serious.
But their families & cronies will be pocketing a shyte load of tax payers $$$. All that research, project proposals, o/s fact finding junkets, newly formed international corporations head quartered in tumble down sheds on Kangaroo Island etc.
I heard the guy from Frontier Economics on ABC last night saying “I’ve been doing energy modelling a lot longer than AEMO or CSIRO… I don’t really need to justify myself to them”… nearly spat out my tea 🤣
However, if you use the metric of reaming the taxpayer in order to shovel our money to their mates, they’re experts.
Between them it’s at least $503 million to water companies, Paladin and Dutt’s childcare centres.
Comments
The fact they won't consider other locations just shows they aren't serious.
We know the drill.
🙄🙄🙄
I want to cry
The thought of any of them being elected to government & representing Australia on the world stage makes me cringe.
Methane can be used to drive a generator, so maybe their bullshit might be valuable.
Between them it’s at least $503 million to water companies, Paladin and Dutt’s childcare centres.