Judge: When you start arguing about ICE using this in removal proceedings, that really creates a concern. INA says courts shouldn't get involved in bringing of charges, enforcement. So when you suggest they're violating the Constitution in the *prosecution*, that seems to be immigration court issue.
Comments
It sure sounds like Ms. Ozturk is caught in a ridiculous Catch 22 that disregards her Constitutional rights having been violated.
ACLU: We do believe there's a basis to grant bail right now, but we think alternative could also work—as long as happens urgently.
DOJ: On bail, our threshold position is, considering Jennings, Velasco Lopez, there's a question of whether court is permitted to release. Our argument is court doesn't have jurisdiction.
Judge: There are multiple concerns. Petitioners argue Ozturk's own 1A rights are violated. Second, how arrest happened, whether permitted to know where she was going, etc. Denied ability to get to court.
DOJ: As an advocate, I don't think that would be prejudicial. Would mainly be in details of detention—would need to find detention bed locally, etc
Professional, at least, as they defend the nazi regime
There was so much of this country that was based in good faith. We used to force resignation for breaking that faith.