Though it's a reversal from what Six Flags initially said after the merger, it's not really a surprise. I don't think ANY company could sustainably operate 27 amusement parks at a high degree of quality. Here are my thoughts on which parks are on the chopping block: parklore.com/vault/peek-s... - ThreadSky

About ThreadSky

parklore.com • 6 days ago

Though it's a reversal from what Six Flags initially said after the merger, it's not really a surprise. I don't think ANY company could sustainably operate 27 amusement parks at a high degree of quality.

Here are my thoughts on which parks are on the chopping block: https://parklore.com/vault/peek-special/six-flags-selling-parks/

Comments

portugepunk.bsky.social•6 days ago

SFDK would be a better investment for them without animals at this point. The attractions are underwhelming and spaces are far too small for the animals. Also FYI your article says SFDK has a Superman B&M flier, but Superman there is a Premier Skyrocket.

shovelship.bsky.social•6 days ago

i hope they sell off SFA rather than close it entirely. even if its considered a lower-end six flags park and inferior to great adventure and kings dominion, i'd be really sad to see my home park go.

sammyruntz.bsky.social•6 days ago

My hometown park has DEFINITELY seen better days, and it's been owned by Six Flags off-and-on for decades. I was hoping the most recent re-acquisition would foster some better maintenance, maybe even expansion, but that never happened. I don't want this park to close, I have too many memories.

paintervision.bsky.social•6 days ago

Frontier City always seemed like a priority for SF, carrying a torch for it since the Premier Parks days. Weird because that park seems like it’s always falling short of real success.

Don’t know what survives but SFA makes little sense to keep if Great Adventure or King’s Dominion is a priority.

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply