Kemi Badenoch saying "he had materials about white genocide" on BBC appears to be inaccurate.
She may be conflating two things.
1) he had extensive *materials* about various genocides + colonial violence (Hutu/Tutsi, native American, UK/Mau Mau). No material on "white genocide" in public domain.
She may be conflating two things.
1) he had extensive *materials* about various genocides + colonial violence (Hutu/Tutsi, native American, UK/Mau Mau). No material on "white genocide" in public domain.
Comments
There is no evidence yet in public domain for "he had materials about white genocide" (beyond online rumours)
The gist is she doesn't have & doesn't feel needs to have the specific information it really was relevant to this case to think this case is a chance to make those points
The Mail reports Badenoch’s comments, noting she didn't when asked have evidence about this specific case, beyond her own personal experience of returning to Britain in the mid-1990s
Just look at her trying to take Starmer to task in PMQ's over sexual abuse only to have to admit she's never bothered to meet a victim or speak about the issue in parliament.
I can't see her making it until the next election.
(She was born British, with birthright citizenship in 1980 returning in 1996, so she did not have the experience after 6 years of the citizenship process, test, ceremony of others who naturalise
Did she misunderstand, or
Did she believe online conspiracy stuff she read?
The Southport murderer's father remained a regular church-goer: local church said the son did not attend the church. (No evidence of religious identity/practice)
https://premierchristian.news/en/news/article/kemi-badenoch-believe-god